Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tenacious 1; Boiler Plate
There was no revelation about how “stand off” the F-18 needs to be.

I'm guessing it doesn't have to be an F-18. A satellite, a Predator done (or some future stealthy naval drone), a submarine -- anything that can observe the target and transmit terminal guidance info to the missile.

15 posted on 02/11/2015 11:35:27 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
I'm guessing it doesn't have to be an F-18.

Correct, the real scenario is a MQ-4C Triton drone (naval Globalhawk) or P8 flying hundreds of miles in front of the battle group messaging back the targeting info to Destroyer which will launch the Tomahawk and then have those coordinates updated as the missile progresses to account for moving ships. Once the missile get's close it will guide itself in using it's own seeker.

The ability to update targeting in flight is the critical part. Sure, we've had long distance Tomahawks for a long time but they were only good for hitting static land targets. 1000 miles at launch means almost two hours in the air. A ship or a Bin Laden doesn't sit still that long.
17 posted on 02/11/2015 11:54:59 AM PST by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
I'm guessing it doesn't have to be an F-18.

Yep. Lots of secondary guidance available. And there's always the prospect of it being autonomous. Well, "prospect" might not be a strong enough word. ;-)

21 posted on 02/11/2015 1:00:58 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson