Replies

As a college professor, I am not inclined to look for blatant discrimination and prejudice against Whites....

But when you see what happened to the GM Bondholders, to our Veterans and the VA hospitals, to middle class taxpayers who lost that college-savings account, and to various people systematically getting shafted by Obamacare (not to mention the illegal immigrant open borders “invit,” by the WH), I start to wonder:

What is the percentage?

In other words do Obama and VJ have a ‘cut score’ - a percentage of White U.S. citizens they’re looking to hit by changing these many various programs, as a form of “pay back”?

I know this sounds paranoid, but - you have to start wondering. Is there a pattern, here?

What minimum percentage of “typical” Whites need to be adversely impacted, for it to “qualify” for an active WH policy move?

Never mind that millions (of Caucasians) died in various wars including the Civil War, to liberate people, or that over 20 Trillion in tax dollars have been poured into Great Society programs to assisted those from historically disadvantaged backgrounds who experienced horrible rights violations.

They (the WH academics) don’t care about any of those existing paybacks, the lives lost, or generous public sector compensations. They’re insane Marxists. They don’t even care that many Whites help liberate Slaves at great cost, or that some minorities owned slaves,and were complicit in the slave trade. They are collectivists, not individualists - don’t care about individual actions or choices.

There must be some “percentage” number, they look for. That % means it’s a “Go” for that policy’s fundamental transformation.

What is it — 50% of those to be harmed are from white European backgrounds? 65%? 90%?

I am sure most of the retired people who owned GM stocks were pro’ly Caucasian, I dunno.

“What is the percentage?” That will be my new Tag line.....