Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

Our church just barely made it for the new rules for building a new building. We needed a larger retention pond to account for the new building (and therefore less wooded area for rain to naturally seep into).

What we ended up doing was putting in an underground vault in addition to the existing pit. The vault is under the parking lot, and something like 30’x100’x20’.

The new rules would have prevented us from building the new building as they called for even larger storage capacity - larger than what the property had space for! The site still has more wooded/grassy area than paved or building area. Goofy.


64 posted on 02/09/2015 9:59:31 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve

It is expensive, but would your city have accepted the new porous asphalt? It allows the water to seep through, and therefore acts more like natural turf.


65 posted on 02/09/2015 10:01:00 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson