Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6

Wasn’t the plan theoretically flyable with one engine? Is it possible better training might have helped?


10 posted on 02/07/2015 8:38:14 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: The_Media_never_lie

Can’t be certified to carry passengers if it can’t takeoff with an engine failure.

So yes, it can takeoff with the loss of one engine.


11 posted on 02/07/2015 8:42:40 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Wasn’t the plan theoretically flyable with one engine?

Yeah... as long as it's in flight to begin with.

Having it happen right after takeoff while you are climbing and banking is about the worst time to have it happen, and the least likely you can recover. The higher you are before the engine failure, the better your chances.

A plane, flat and level flight, will start dropping if you bank (turn) it. When you do it at low speed(due to engine loss) and climbing as well.... you are screwed. The pilot knew. I would say that it is amazing he managed to ditch it in the water and avoided hitting anyone on the way down. That's my opinion, anyway.

48 posted on 02/07/2015 9:57:52 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson