Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pilot’s body found still clutching joystick of crashed plane
FreeMaylasiaToday.com ^ | February 6, 2015 | AFP

Posted on 02/07/2015 8:19:25 PM PST by Reverend Saltine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: ltc8k6
"ATR72-600 meets all requirements for one engine climbout."

Unless they got behind the minimum controllable airspeed, critical engine out.

It may have a service ceiling of 11,000MSL on one engine, but that's not on takeoff, and possibly at max gross weight.

41 posted on 02/07/2015 9:44:22 PM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

You are the one that posted an Airbus pic.


42 posted on 02/07/2015 9:46:06 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1; Reverend Saltine
I think of Sopwith Camels when I hear joystick, aren’t the controls in modern aircraft called yokes?

Probably a language difference thing. The pilot's name was Capt. Yu and what they originally said was "the yokes on Yu".

(j.k.)

43 posted on 02/07/2015 9:50:06 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

I also posted an ATR72-600 pic.

The confusion is from the news article, which is written as if this plane has joysticks, when it doesn’t.

Just to be clear, the plane that crashed was not an Airbus, and it had Yokes, not joysticks.


44 posted on 02/07/2015 9:52:06 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

That aircraft has had some really questionable hull loss accidents. Trans Asia lost one last June nearly identical to the ATR-72-600 that crashed this week.. The pilot was on final approach in IFR conditions and ended up flying it into the ground short of the runway. The last sounds on the CVR is that of the port propeller clipping treetops.

CC


45 posted on 02/07/2015 9:53:29 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (Cogito ergo non liberalo: I think, therefore I'm not a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine; blackdog

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUQWJai59lo

In this video it is a brick, not an airplane.


46 posted on 02/07/2015 9:55:04 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

OK, I just dislike Airbus.


47 posted on 02/07/2015 9:55:17 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Wasn’t the plan theoretically flyable with one engine?

Yeah... as long as it's in flight to begin with.

Having it happen right after takeoff while you are climbing and banking is about the worst time to have it happen, and the least likely you can recover. The higher you are before the engine failure, the better your chances.

A plane, flat and level flight, will start dropping if you bank (turn) it. When you do it at low speed(due to engine loss) and climbing as well.... you are screwed. The pilot knew. I would say that it is amazing he managed to ditch it in the water and avoided hitting anyone on the way down. That's my opinion, anyway.

48 posted on 02/07/2015 9:57:52 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

A powered aircraft that loses power is a glider. Fly it like a glider and you have a chance at making a landing you can walk away from.

Remember US Airways flight 1549 that landed in the Hudson River?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549

How about the Gimli Glider incident?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

How about Air Transat flight 236 that glided for close to 100 miles and landed at an airport in the Azores?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Transat_Flight_236

In all three cases these aircraft lost complete power and still landed safely.


49 posted on 02/07/2015 10:02:46 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

From what has been posted by the mass media of this crash and other Asian civilian air transport planes Asians don’t know how to fly their aircraft without computers.


50 posted on 02/07/2015 10:04:27 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
So yes, it can takeoff with the loss of one engine.

That depends on the weight load, the air temperature, and when the failure occurs.

If you take off (climb) and you turn (bank) and one engine fails, you can be in a non-recoverable position. It depends a lot on which engine. The laws of physics and aerodynamics rule over certifications.

51 posted on 02/07/2015 10:05:27 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

That video reminds me of Air France flight 447 in which the pilots kept pulling back on the joystick and ended up stalling the aircraft right into the ocean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447

I see that as another case of them not knowing how to fly their aircraft without a computer helping them.


52 posted on 02/07/2015 10:08:18 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

None of those were stalled.

None of those were T-tails, known for deep stalls.


53 posted on 02/07/2015 10:15:32 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

T-Tails! Thank You for that walk down white knuckled lane!


54 posted on 02/07/2015 10:17:50 PM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
All passenger certified twins will follow those guidelines as far as I know.

The planes might, but do the pilots have to deal with tricky climbout patterns in airports in that country ?

What I am saying is that the certification is based on some set parameters. You can put the plane in a position where it cannot recover quickly enough to gain enough airspeed to keep flying.

55 posted on 02/07/2015 10:18:48 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

The key with a prop is to get the dead engine’s prop to feather, otherwise it’s a lot of drag.

One engine out on takeoff is probably the most trained for and practiced problem.


56 posted on 02/07/2015 10:20:43 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Pilot, meet SID. Where real estate values are an existential threat to public safety.


57 posted on 02/07/2015 10:25:49 PM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I got my multi rating years ago in a 55 Piper Apache. It was a marginal airplane at best. The Aztec replaced the Apache.


58 posted on 02/07/2015 10:43:58 PM PST by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

A book by a P-38 pilot talked about losing an engine. He said the remaining engine would carry you to the scene of the crash.


59 posted on 02/07/2015 10:45:04 PM PST by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux
Yeah. I went from the Aztec to the Cheyenne. Not many around, but I sure loved that plane. I had a little MU-2 Solitaire time. Just enough to be dangerous in it. The Cheyenne and MU-2 are really two pilot aircraft.
60 posted on 02/07/2015 10:49:50 PM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson