Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer
No. Period. Not now. People do not realize the ramifications of solar. Enough sad for now.
4 posted on 02/07/2015 8:16:52 PM PST by Fungi (Evolution is piece by piece over billions of years. At what point did a precursor become a human?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fungi
People don't understand the physics and economics of solar. There's a maximum amount of power per square meter on the clearest Summer Solstice at the equator, and it goes dramatically downhill from there based on latitude, weather, volcanic pollution, (eclipses...)

Throw in the aging of panels, storage mediums, distance from storage, etc., and it just isn't worth it for non-specific, non-tuned applications.

26 posted on 02/07/2015 8:59:19 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Fungi

Solar? The next shale? NO. Even in a theoretical 100% efficiency you still only achieve 50% for daylight. Add in the loss of direct light to 30% of the time the panel can run at full efficiency. Then throw in rain, clouds, fog, snow, etc...

AND to top it off there is only so much energy that hits the earth from the sun.

The cost of building the panels, installing the panels, and the fact that the energy needs to be stored in some way doesn’t make any sense. Unless, of course, you are a politician spending other people’s money.


42 posted on 02/08/2015 12:03:56 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson