Posted on 02/03/2015 9:28:11 AM PST by EagleUSA
California state regulators allowed oil companies to dispose of wastewater in clean groundwater supplies for years, according to a new report.
The San Francisco Chronicle, citing a review of state data, reports that oil companies built more than 170 waste-disposal wells feeding into bodies of groundwater that could otherwise have been used for drinking or irrigation during one of the areas worst droughts in centuries. The wells are primarily located in the states agricultural Central Valley region, which was particularly devastated by the drought.
(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...
So far, tests of nearby drinking-water wells show no contamination, state officials say. But the federal Environmental Protection Agency, which helped uncover the practice, is threatening to seize control of regulating the waste-injection wells, a job it has left to California officials for over 30 years. The state faces a Feb. 6 deadline to tell the EPA how it plans to fix the problem and prevent it from happening again.
http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/State-let-oil-companies-taint-drinkable-water-in-6054242.php
The wastewater injection problem stretches back to 1983.
EPA officials that year signed an agreement giving Californias oil field regulators the states Divison of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources responsibility for enforcing the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. The agreement listed, by name, aquifers considered exempt, where oil companies could legally inject leftover water with a simple permit from the division. If state regulators wanted to add any aquifers to the list, they would need EPAs aproval.
But there were two signed copies of the agreement, said Steven Bohlen, the divisions new supervisor. Eleven aquifers listed as exempt on one copy werent included on the other. The state and the oil companies considered those aquifers exempt perfectly suitable places to dispose of wastewater. The EPA didnt.
We cannot tell, nor can the EPA, which version is correct, said Bohlen, appointed by Gov. Jerry Brown last year.
The bureaucratic confusion didnt stop there. In some cases, the state treated entire aquifers as exempt when, in fact, only specific portions of them had been approved for oil industry use. In other instances, the state issued injection permits for aquifers that the EPA had never declared exempt, Blumenfeld said.....
In all, 464 wells injected wastewater into aquifers that were supposed to be protected, according to state data. That includes 94 wells drilled into the 11 aquifers that the state considered exempt and the EPA didnt.
Some of the aquifers that were breached were so salty that they would be difficult to use. But a third of the aquifers are believed to hold water that at least before injection began was clean enough to drink, either with some treatment or none at all.
To gauge water quality in a river, lake or aquifer, researchers often start with the waters total dissolved solids salts and other materials in the liquid. High counts dont necessarily make water harmful to drink, but they can cloud it and give it a salty or bitter taste.
DemocRats at work — running and ruining California.
I’d love to know how big the bribes were.
Most likely the acquifers were not useful for drinking water which is common.
Most water is injected into the area of the drilling in order to to keep pressure on the oil. I simply do not believe that the charges to have any merit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.