Define amnesty.
Some people claim if you are not in favor of 100% deportation of illegals then you support amnesty.
Really 2nd? You want to go there?
Exactly the question to ask.
BTW, I’ve stopped my jihad against Ted Cruz purely because he’s still head and shoulders above the Rat candidate and the Pubbies other than Governor Palin. I expect the same courtesy for Walker.
That’s the trick
Exactly. 2nd Division Are any of the potential candidates stating that they are in support of Amnesty? What are his plans for the illegals already here?
Did they ask him if he would support citizenship for the illegals that are here in the country now? Amnesty means just handing them over citizenship. Walker has repeatedly stated that he supports a “pathway to citizenship”. In other words, something like fining them, making them go to the “back of the line” or leave and come back.
Of course he isn’t going to be stupid enough to say he supports amnesty. Are people going to go with what he said a couple of years ago when he wasn’t running for POTUS or what he said today a year and a half before he hopes to be POTUS?
Someone asked “How are we going to deport them all?” The same way they got here. If over 100,000 illegals managed to find their way over our borders I’m sure they can figure out how to get back home. Several past presidents have had large deportations. It’s been done. Many of them would leave on their own if we didn’t make things so cushy for them like giving their kids free educations and free medical care. That would be a nice start.
And pointing out discrepancies in a candidate’s statements and comparing the candidates is not declaring JIHAD against them. It is part of the political process and the way we discriminate between candidates.
Sometimes it feels like some of us are debating with a cult instead of reasonable logical people.
I’m waiting for someone to ask Walker how he plans to deal with illegals and what his statements referring to “a pathway to citizenship” really means. It sounds to me like he went out there to do damage control. It’s no secret to him that many conservatives are concerned about his wavering immigration statements.
People need to ask themselves why he isn’t being clear about it. If he had a policy in mind that he believes conservatives could get behind and support why isn’t he talking about that?