Well that really begs the question chris;
If the officer thought the suspect had a weapon, why in tarnation would the officer get off her once he clearly had her subdued and then move away from the suspect, allowing the armed suspect to get up???
What if she couldn’t breathe
LOL!
chris, you've come up with every excuse, "What if that happened, and what if this happened, what about if this and that happened" and on and on...
What happened is all on good quality video.
Anyway, this is like beating on a dead horse.
I want a beer. I'll come back later. I might feel like beating the horse some more in a while.
Then what?
Again, this is a question that only he can answer. I have already given you the theories I can come up with. You say they are excuses, but they are just the answers I've come up with. I haven't excused him on anything else other than the shooting. I don't have enough information to excuse him or hold him accountable procedure wise at this point.
LOL! chris, you've come up with every excuse, "What if that happened, and what if this happened, what about if this and that happened" and on and on...
That was a clever response on my part though >;D
But seriously, as I said, they aren't excuses, I haven't excused him, they are simply responses in a conversation. We don't have to talk about this if you don't want. There truly isn't much point as we are both lacking necessary information at this time.
What happened is all on good quality video.
Yeah, it is, but the audio isn't there, and neither is any interview with the officers, both of which I'd like to have access to.
Also I read that the Texas Rangers declined to release the audio on the grounds that they don't want to jeopardize the integrity of their investigation.
That seems fine with me at this point. The only thing that matters is truth, so let's let them get to it.
Then what?