Posted on 01/25/2015 7:03:38 AM PST by SJackson
The former U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Martin Indyk, has called on Israels leaders to stay out of Americas politics just hours after he urged the United States to interfere in Israels politics, something he himself has been doing for years.
The latest events began with John Boehners invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress. The New York Times quickly sought a comment from Indyk, who is constantly quoted by the news media since the conclusion of his singularly unsuccessful term as the Obama Administrations chief envoy for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.
Netanyahu is using the Republican Congress for a photo-op for his election campaign, said Indyk, who apparently finds it inconceivable that the prime minister of Israel might want to speak to Congress about using Congressional sanctions to prevent Iran from nuking Israel. And the Republicans are using Bibi for their campaign against Obama It would be far wiser for us to stay out of their politics and for them to stay out of ours.
That line about both sides staying out of the others business sounds reasonable and evenhanded. Until you realize that before he spoke to the Times, Indyk let loose his real feelings via Twitter: Why should Netanyahu be able to speak and Herzog not, he angrily tweeted, referring to Israeli Labor Party leader Isaac Herzog. If Boehner is placing Congress into the midst of the Israeli elections, why dont the Democrats invite Herzog too?
The answer to Indyks petulant question is that Netanyahu is the prime minister. Israels prime minister is invited to speak in other countries and the leader of the opposition is not, just as no Republican leader is invited to speak when President Obama is invited to deliver an address in another country.
Note, by the way, that Indyk served as ambassador to Israel in 1995, when Yitzhak Rabin was prime minister, and in 2000, when Ehud Barak was prime minister. We dont recall him ever demanding that Netanyahu, who was then the opposition leader, be invited along when Rabin or Barak came to the United States. For some reason, Indyks demand for fairness and balance applies only when it benefits the Israeli Labor Party.
The irony is that if there is one person in the diplomatic world who is well known for interfering in Israels politics, its Martin Indyk.
Consider: ◾Knesset Members David Levy and Aryeh Deri revealed on July 26, 1995, that Ambassador Indyk personally lobbied them, and other MKs, to oppose a Knesset bill that would have made it harder for Israel to give the Golan Heights to Syria. (Agence France Presse, July 26, 1995) ◾Israel Television reported on December 18, 1996, that Ambassador Indyk visited former Chief Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, spiritual leader of the Shas party, and asked Yosef to order Interior Minister Eli Suissa (a Shas representative) to block a housing project in a part of Jerusalem that was beyond the 1967 line. ◾The chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, MK Uzi Landau, revealed in March 1997 that Ambassador Indyk had been pressuring members of the government and interfering in Israels internal political affairs. (Haaretz, March 16, 1997) ◾The Israeli daily Yediot Ahronot reported on July 8, 1997, that Ambassador Indyk took part in the effort to block Prime Minister Netanyahus choice for finance minister.
Its worth recalling that when Indyk was nominated, in 1997, to serve as Assistant Secretary of State, The New Republic opposed the nomination on the grounds that as ambassador in Israel, Indyk distinguished himself by exhorting [President Clinton] to campaign for [Labor Party leader] Shimon Peres in the 1996 Israeli elections.
Thats right, the same Indyk who tweeted about inviting the head of Israels Labor Party to address Congress, and then turned around a few hours later and piously told the New York Times that neither side should interfere in the others politics he himself sought American presidential intervention to help a previous Labor Party leader in an Israeli election.
Hypocrisy? Two-facedness? Political bias? Sure, all of those terms describe Martin Indyk. But most of all, his behavior appears to be guided by a desperate hope that nobody will bother to take a look at his own record.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
We’re lucky he hasn’t been recycled into this administration again but give them time. They are pros at picking up all the loonies and making them important again. Gads!
He was for a couple years, Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations, quit last year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.