Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NetAddicted
Marriage is a religious sacrament and as such has no place in a Government definition. Marriage is as God defines it.

Civil Unions can be between two dogs as long as it satisfies a Government legal definition for legal purposes. The twain should never meet.

A Married man and woman should have both a marriage and a civil union satisfying both God and the Government. IMHO.

16 posted on 01/18/2015 12:44:02 PM PST by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Mugged

The problem with the religious marriage theory is that the parties to this contract undertake certain obligations to one another that human nature inclines them to default on unless the counterparty has an enforcement procedure or, failing that, a way to recover damages.

Just as with all other contracts, this requires the power of the ruler to enforce.

True marriage requires no divorce, criminalization of adultery, and laws supporting traditional gender roles (higher pay for men, alimony).

Almost no one supports any of these pillars of true marriage, in fact, all laws enabling true marriage have been repealed. So, no matter what anyone says, almost no one supports true marriage,


24 posted on 01/18/2015 2:23:08 PM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson