Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M1903A1

“I thought that kind of testing had been ruled discriminatory in Griggs v. Duke Power?”

I thought it was discriminatory simply because, according to my headhunter, they disproportionately screened out blacks. I suppose the companies are somewhat protected by the fact that, in all cases, you have to take the test before they ever see you. I don’t know the ins-and-outs of the law and, it’s possible, neither do the companies requiring the tests. Incidentally, the tests were all independently administered and scored by a third party company and they also never get to see or talk to the candidate.


79 posted on 01/17/2015 11:28:52 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather

Personally, I’d rather deal with tests than the must-haz-degree BS that’s only served to dilute actual learning.


86 posted on 01/17/2015 5:39:32 PM PST by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson