[Carry_Okie]

If you have not figured out that SCOTUS has been making up the constitution as it goes along for the last 80 years (e.g. Wickard 1942, KELO 2005 etc.), why are you here?

You may not like what was done to Kelo, but the case was correctly. The result was that a good many States passed laws increasing protections for property owners, some to include regulatory and fractional takings. All will now get to witness the results of the differences in protection for private property among the States, which is how Federalism was supposed to work. So the actual result in total was not all bad.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

"You may not like what was done to Kelo, but the case was correctly."

KELO interpretation of the 5th Amendment "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

You can't/don't read and neither can/do they.