Not invested in Newt per se at all - which is said many times in my best seller election book - in hundreds of radio interviews and TV interviews - I’m invested in IDEAS - and Newt was the only one to deal in the idea of conservatism v liberalism. Well, Cain for a while, but mainly just Newt.
I’ve said that anyone in the field carrying Newts message would have been great and would have won. But no one in that field was willing or capable to do so. I’m all about IDEAS and only interested in people in politics relative to their ideas. PERIOD.
Like most people called Field Marshall....mostly dead Nazis.....you don’t know half the shit you think you do.
You are just spouting off what the estab hacks at Fox and inside Rove’s super PAC and inside Romney’s campaign are doing. You just quote blah blah blah conventional wisdom because you’ve never had an original thought...not one I’ve seen.
Eddie, Eddie, Eddie. Did you just seriously go there ? I don't know what's more insulting, being compared to Nazis or accused of mouthing Karl Rove or Willard talking points. If you knew me at all, which you don't, you'd know I'm about the most anti-establishment/anti-beltway and anti-Willard poster on Free Republic. I've spent almost a decade exposing that fraud from Massachusetts (which you seem to conveniently ignore in order to rant on) and gone toe-to-toe with his similarly brainwashed trolls or paid agents on this board (ones who, btw, attempted to hijack and/or leverage this website you're posting on).
Frankly, given your comments here, and your derangement at the slightest critique of Gingrich, I'm shocked anyone takes you seriously. You responded to precisely none of my specific points in my prior posts, and certainly nothing you've said directly to me could be described as particularly reasoned, but a litany of insults and "I'm better than you because I have a best selling book." I know a few published authors get a swelled head, but yours makes the Graf Zeppelin look like a microbe.