To: traumer
Remove the word “Radical” and we got a deal.
2 posted on
01/10/2015 9:41:26 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(With friends like Boehner, we don't need Democrats. -- Laz A. Mataz, 2015)
To: Lazamataz
Its a little like declaring war on the “bad nazis” while leaving the good ones alone.
6 posted on
01/10/2015 9:42:56 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(You can't half ass conservatism.)
To: Lazamataz
Utter
scheiss unsin (I can't write out german characters) on the French premier's part. European antisemites have no desire to oppose evil. They want to join in the Jew hating fun of the Muslims, but they can't as the attack on that Paris "Mad Magazine" place shows.
22 posted on
01/10/2015 10:10:56 AM PST by
Stepan12
(Our present appeasement of Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
To: Lazamataz
I was wondering myself how do they tell the difference between radical and non radical. The only criteria I can think of is radicals are the ones who’ve attacked already. Non radicals are waiting for their chance.
32 posted on
01/10/2015 10:35:05 AM PST by
VerySadAmerican
(Obama voters are my enemy. And so are republican voters.)
To: Lazamataz
"Remove the word Radical and we got a deal."In this context the words "muslim and "radical" are synonyms. The premiere is only being redundant.
36 posted on
01/10/2015 10:37:29 AM PST by
semaj
(Nothing will change until lying becomes an extremely dangerous & expensive habit.)
To: Lazamataz
“Remove the word Radical and we got a deal.”
My thoughts exactly. “Moderate islam” is simply the Trojan Horse to get the rest of islam into the country.
40 posted on
01/10/2015 10:45:58 AM PST by
CodeToad
(Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson