What “case”?
Are we supposed to get endless “do-overs” on this? Does not attempting to present the same “evidence” over and over, with no mitigating circumstances or additional information, constitute something called “double jeopardy”, EXPRESSLY violating the law?
The legally constituted grand jury has spoken, and could find NO instance of malfeasance on the part of Darren Wilson, in the performance of his duties as a police officer.
“What “case”?”
Yeah, I guess the NAACP doesn’t understand double jeopardy either!
They are like the DemoRATS and vote counting, you just keep trying an individual until you get the verdict you like.
The Grand Jury Case.