In pictorial form:
They caved again.
There was no executive order.
not...
Boehner, Orange IS the new yellow! Wear it with pride.
Which means, they'll reluctantly allow the bill to the floor of the House, knowing it will pass, but also KNOWING the Senate will pull anything out that is controversial or slows the Executive.
They'll then claim they did their duty...but "It would be irresponsible, in this day and age, to allow DHS to shutdown"
More specifically, as a consequence of low-information voters electing federal senators who didn’t know the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers any better than the voter did, corrupt senators failed to protect their states by not killing constitutionally indefensible immigration bills, wrongly usurping 10th Amendment-protected state powers when they supported such bills.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
There is no real fight concerning Obama’s amnesty imo. As previously mentioned, this is because the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate immigration. So Obama actually has no constitutionally defensible federal immigration laws to pardon imo.
The remedy to this mess is the following. Patriots must exercise their voting muscle to peacefully force the corrupt feds to surrender 10th Amendment-protected state powers, powers which the corrupt feds have wrongly stolen from the states, back to the states. Otherwise, it’s just a matter of time before someone even more lawless than Obama starts exercising constitutionally nonexistant powers from the Oval Office.
Remember, the 10th Amendment is probably one of the best-kept secrets in corrupt DC.
...According to a letter circulated in the House by Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX), Democrats see a political opportunity in attacking the GOP...
Of course they do and why not be led by a Communista that grew up in San Antonio led by another Communista, his mother. Both of these wetbacks should have been caught at the border and drowned.
The Plan: they’re going to give Obama everything he wants.
Then they’re going to raise our taxes as high as they can get them.
We can thank them now. :)
In pictorial form:
I looked up “Secure Communities” on the ICE website and they lowballed the figure at 10 Million, said they obviously cannot do the job of enforcement, and have come up with a much more “common-sense” figure of 368,000, which is not the same thing at all.
Seems woefully short but better than nothing? maybe??
F'n Idiots
Obama was photoed signing "memos" on AF One---not an "executive action." Why? B/c an E/O comes w/ legal baggage that the conniving Boobamba wanted to evade. Both "memos" are now on the Whitehouse website.
The scam works this way: signed Boobamba memos "delegate" to federal agencies orders to come up with plans (that must advance Boobamba's global conspiracy to overthrow the US govt w/ Third World federales and their cadres jumping the US border).
The federal agencies then "invent" Committees to do this (the better to overthrow the US govt). Then "Administrative Rules," after a comment period, will be published in the "Code of Federal Regulations," which magically turns them into law........ using federal fairy dust.
So Boobamba is shielded from responsibility---he doesn't have to take the hit. Behind closed doors, he tells federal factotums what he wants.....and faster than you can say "the combo plate w/ extra hot sauce".....the overthrow of the US govt commences.
====================================================
THE "DELEGATION" HORROR STORY--A Federal agency MO since 1946. It's down to a science: (1) publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), (2) make the comment period really short, (3) stonewall any negative comments, and, (4) publish the rule, which (5) NOW has the force of US law. No Congressman was ever involved, and Boobamba doesn't leave his DNA on it. Yet again, why "Delegation" is ominous for liberty---why the writing of administrative law by federal agencies - is un-Constitutional. (Thanks to FReeper Regulator's info.)
===================================================
FREEPER ACTION NOW: Write your governor; call your state attorney general. Nullification means power to the states and power to the people.
The judiciary has consistently ruled against the nullification doctrine, asserting its unique, judicial right to declare laws unconstitutional. But this executive order isn’t a law. And given its extremely shaky legal footing, it isn’t difficult to imagine a federal bench recognizing the states’ right to disregard federal orders that don’t clearly have the force of law.
And that would be a tremendous — tremendous — blow against the executive’s assumption of legislative powers.
But in the shorter, more direct term: It would force the Obama administration to go on offense, perhaps suing the states to enforce a law........ that isn’t a law.
AS OF TODAY---25 states have joined in the nullification action.
Why?