No it doesn’t; (1) is first test. Voltaire and Dawkins will stop right there. Protected speech.
Dawkins is about as emotional as you can get. A prominent sign of irrational thinking is when you refuse to acknowledge that your assertions have been demolished by the logic of your opponent. Just observe Dawkins debate John Lennox.
Wanting to assume the appearance of engaging in reasoned speech is not the same as actually engaging in it.
Looks like your way will lead to removal of protection from all speech.