Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eyeamok
Based upon the report, you are correct. . .but you are assuming everything that happened, all the facts, are reported.

Wait for the full report.

I am sure we will see this innocent guy didn't simply walk in the store, pick up three phones, take them to the cashier, attempt to pay cash and was out-of-the-blue refused service asked to leave, and the officer just jumped in roughly to forcefully remove this quiet innocent SOB (Son of Barrack) from the store.

We always fuss about media bias and lack of facts when reporting on all things political, and rightfully so. I suggest we also view media reports on situations like this with the same critical eye.

35 posted on 01/07/2015 8:19:46 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Hulka
Wait for the full report.

The article does not say that Davidson asked for account information on a third party. It just says that the store does not give that information out. We have to do a lot of assuming here. Truth is, the article does not give enough information for us to know what really happened.

63 posted on 01/07/2015 9:34:43 AM PST by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson