whaddeesay?
FReep You Jeb Bush (FUJB)!!
Next he’ll “move on” to polygamy and to lowering the age of consent.
Respecting the “rule of law” would be following, and enforcing, the laws (and the constitutional amendments) made by the People or their representatives.
Laying down for courts with no authority rendering lawless and increasingly crazy decisions is most certainly NOT the rule of law. It’s rule by lawyers, which is not the same thing at all.
The Governor of Florida is a coequal authority with his state courts, and as the only one who has taken an oath to faithfully execute the people’s laws is arguably superior to Article III courts, at least those established by Congress.
This is the time for open defiance, not AGAINST the rule of law but in recognition that defiance of immoral and unconstitutional orders IS the rule of law
Respecting the “rule of law” would be following, and enforcing, the laws (and the constitutional amendments) made by the People or their representatives.
Laying down for courts with no authority rendering lawless and increasingly crazy decisions is most certainly NOT the rule of law. It’s rule by lawyers, which is not the same thing at all.
The Governor of Florida is a coequal authority with his state courts, and as the only one who has taken an oath to faithfully execute the people’s laws is arguably superior to Article III courts, at least those established by Congress.
This is the time for open defiance, not AGAINST the rule of law but in recognition that defiance of immoral and unconstitutional orders IS the rule of law
This crap is just exactly why I am ready and willing to raise taxes on the wealthy country club GOP establishment as well as the liberal gentrys that run the Dem party.
We do? You mean we can't just ignore laws we don't like? Or shop for Federal judges who are sympathetic to our ideology and overturn lower court decisions, willy-nilly? Or justify lawlessness in the name of 'civil disobedience'?
Well, rats...
Leftists do not respect the “rule of law”. If the SCOTUS rules against them, they ignore it and find ways around it.
I’ll never vote for another Bush.
What a load of horse hockey pucks. WE must follow the rule of law while the perverts break any law they wish.
Jeb is well on his way to outdoing Dad and Brother in putziness.
I am already ready to move on from Jeb Bush!
Has Boehner endorsed Jebbie yet, or is that being saved for the climax?
The country is finished. F u jeb
We'd love to. But we have rogue judges, militant gays venue shopping and jumped-up local officials violating the will of the people as expressed time and again.
In addition, does this respect for the rule of law extend to our borders? Our welfare system vis-a-vis eligibility?
Isn't it interesting that unilateral abandonment of principles is described as 'moving on' or 'getting it off the table?' If we follow this policy to its logical conclusion what, exactly, will Jeb Bush and/or the GOP actually stand for?
Because we have allowed government to define “marriage” for its own purposes (such as taxation and regulation of estates), we have allowed government to define marriage as a social institution. That was fine as long as people in control of government were generally supportive of God’s original definition of marriage. However we have entered a time when a growing number of people in control of government want to redefine marriage for their own purposes, which in part is contrary to God’s definition.
Marriage is now far more a matter of politics and ideology than of private religious beliefs.
Therefore, for the sake of marriage as God defines it, it is time to remove from government the power to define who is married and who is not. Then people could form whatever relationships they please but they could not force those who disagree to be enablers for those relationships. And we would not have schools that must teach that homosexual “marriages” are just as legitimate as heterosexual ones. Nor would we have owners of wedding-related services being threatened with arrest and being convicted of a crime for merely declining to artfully photograph a “marriage” they find morally repugnant.
Terry Schiavo.
Now, people, now that the GOP has finally openly declared war on Conservatives, do you really want the guy running the show and picking the death panels to be the one who would starve and dehydrate a helpless woman to death?
He could have stopped it.
If what was done to that lady had been done to an axe murderer there would have been an incredible outcry over 'cruel and unusual punishment'.
What was her crime?
Not only NO, Jeb, but HELL NO!
That’s the story of the Bush family. The Dems grab power and enact Socialist programs. The Bushes shrug and say we have to accept it. No More Bushes. Ever.