The Global Warming/Cooling ?
“Depending on the data set used,”
I love that one. You know which one the global warming crowd is going to take.
Despite their loud protestations to the contrary, people who hold secular religious beliefs (e.g., devout members of the cult of global warming) are impervious to facts, data, logic and science. To them, unless it is in full agreement with their secular dogma, things such as facts, data, science and logic constitute blasphemy — there is no reasoning involved in their thinking and position.
"Are you "gonna" believe me or that lying ass thermometer and lying ass satellites, and lying ass polar bears, and lying ass space images of arctic and antarctic ice? I would like to speak more but I must leave early in my G4 Gulfstream Jet before the blizzard hits and I am unable to get back to California to my Mansions and SUVs. Please contact me at my website for the purchase of discounted carbon credits.
For the the last 50 years governments have funded trillions $ of dollars in fake global warming research to create a massive hoax called global warming. Then after 100 years of tweaking laws government comes up with their final solution for solving the world's problems drum roll..... banning lightbulbs: that government did this shows that government is a cancer that must be minimized to bare essentials and constitutional limits.
The federal government banned lightbulbs in the USA and the news media hid this from the people:
http://reason.com/reasontv/2014/01/09/the-dumbest-new-ban-in-2014-incandescent
All this "global warming" hoopla is akin to the magicians slight of hand distractions while he does something to fool the audience...like in this case, destroying the Constitution and "Fundamentally changing America". We watch one hand while the other, Obama and his Marxists and One Worlders deftly strip away the 200 plus years of freedom that the founding fathers tried to give us. Abracadabra...poof!
In true science when the predictions of the theory fail to match the observed data, then the theory is rejected. However, the man caused CO2 driven theory of global warming is rooted in politics not science so it cannot be rejected. Finally people are realizing that all the predictions of global warming have not come true especially as we experience another round of polar vortexes.
On the rocks? Is liberalism on the rocks? Socialism? How about political correctness? Is that on the rocks too? C’mon. No chance.
Another few years? How many is "a few" to a Man Made Global Warming Religion Follower? The abstract condition that is "time" has confounded the multitude of human hating fanatics that are members of this religion for some time now. To them, time is a dynamic and flexible entity that often needs to be refined, tuned, transformed and re-created for the purpose of specific data manipulation.
I figure, in this instance, they are setting "a few" at 100 years or so. But not until the next ice age is in full swing with glaciers building in the UP.
Well, if you are selling the idea that one trace totally natural and necessary atmospheric gas going from 0.03% of the atmosphere to 0.04% is causing a imminent global catastrophe, then I think your models are BS and that you are a hustler.
Follow the money.