Skip to comments.
Global Warming on the Rocks
Accuracy in Academia ^
| January 3, 2015
| Malcolm A. Kline
Posted on 01/05/2015 8:24:28 AM PST by Academiadotorg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: The Great RJ
The Great RJ:".. man caused CO2 driven theory of global warming is rooted in politics not science so it cannot be rejected."
The politics of Federal additional taxation without the science to back it up.
That is why the EPA refuses to release to Congress the methodology of how it determined the significance of CO2 to "Glow-Bull" warming,
because there is no science to back it up - just Obama politics !
To: Academiadotorg
Global Cooling Global Warming Climate Change Climate Disruption...if the science is settled, how come the name keeps changing?
22
posted on
01/05/2015 10:55:55 AM PST
by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: Academiadotorg
Some climatologists have argued that within another few years at most, if the pause continues, it will lead inescapably to the conclusion that climate models are oversensitive to GHGs Well, if you are selling the idea that one trace totally natural and necessary atmospheric gas going from 0.03% of the atmosphere to 0.04% is causing a imminent global catastrophe, then I think your models are BS and that you are a hustler.
Follow the money.
23
posted on
01/05/2015 6:37:23 PM PST
by
Ditto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson