Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster; occamrzr06
Back in the day (if my day can still be considered "the day"!) I was on NATO maneuvers in that area. We war gamed between Stuttgart and Munich. It is beautiful country, forested and hilly, ideal defensive terrain. Of course, that's what we wanted back in the Cold War. Stuttgart has some big auto plants, but there's not much else of value.

Devers was artillery. He was one of the men who modernized fire control at Ft. Sill, which paved the way for the devastating effectiveness of American artillery in WWII.

I can't figure out what the problem was leading to the Ike personality dispute. During the North Africa and Sicily campaigns, Devers replaced Ike as commander of the ETO, which at that time was just the British Isles. Maybe Ike thought he was trying to steal his command?

Marshall really liked Devers, so it seems a little odd that Ike took such a dislike to him.

44 posted on 12/31/2014 10:56:41 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

Devers was in the running for SHAEF command. I think Ike saw him as a rival. Maybe it was nothing more than a personality conflict. There are guys I know who are generally well-liked but I personally can’t stand to be in the same room with them. And I know some guys who most people think are a$$holes but I get on with them all right.

It’s just how we’re put toghether.

Strange as it seems, from what I’ve read I think I would probably have gotten along reasonably well with both Monty and Patton, but would have had no use for Bradley.


46 posted on 12/31/2014 11:06:27 AM PST by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson