Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kackikat
CNN weather guy was showing map and stating the turbulence and storm went upwards of 53,000 ft, so no way to avoid it.

That doesn't mean the entire sky is covered in thunderstorms up to 53,000 feet. They could be isolated, or embedded, or in a nearly solid line. At any rate radar can paint these storms very effectively, so they can be avoided (with a competent operator).

The weather is reported by air traffic control as "tops up to 53,000 feet"; "isolated area of thunderstorms with tops up to 53,000 feet", etc.

But for sure, if one has tops that high, it has severe turbulence within it.

254 posted on 12/27/2014 10:26:21 PM PST by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


To: zipper

I think he said ‘tops up to 53,000 ft’, and that would explain the turbulence they were dealing with, and of course they couldn’t go that high....so they must have tried to fly through the storm right?


258 posted on 12/27/2014 10:34:03 PM PST by Kackikat ('If it talks like a traitor, acts like a traitor, then by God it's a traitor.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: zipper

Now he is correcting himself at 52,000 ft.


259 posted on 12/27/2014 10:35:01 PM PST by Kackikat ('If it talks like a traitor, acts like a traitor, then by God it's a traitor.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson