Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia test-launches new space eco-rocket Angara right into geostationary orbit
Liveleak.com, Russian Defense Ministry ^ | Dec-23-2014 | unknown

Posted on 12/23/2014 9:45:32 AM PST by Patriot777

Russia’s space agency has launched a heavy version of the newly developed ecologically clean rocket family Angara. The booster is to take its mock payload right to the geostationary orbit – over 35,000 kilometers from the Equator.

“A 08:57 Moscow time, the heavy-class rocket Angara-A5 was launched by a Space Forces crew of the Arkhangelsk Region from the universal launch site of the state test facility of the Russian Defense Ministry [the Plesetsk Cosmodrome],” the ministry said in a statement.

The success was reported by Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu to President Vladimir Putin, who was monitoring the launch form Moscow via a video link.

The major peculiarity of this test launch has become its main goal: the rocket is to deliver its mock two-ton payload directly to geostationary orbit – the orbit right above the Equator that has a period of one sidereal day, or 23 hours 56 minutes and 4 seconds; objects rotating around the earth in this orbit can fly as far away as 35,700 kilometers from the planet’s surface.

Launching right into geostationary orbit has never been practiced before by any heavy booster prototype – usually trials are performed to a low orbit with altitudes of up to 2,000km before moving on to higher altitudes.

The first stage of the Angara-5 rocket, capable of delivering up to 25 tons to a low orbit, is powered by RD-191, arguably the world’s best “clean” engine that uses kerosene and oxygen as fuel.

Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ba6_1419316298#A8brFhBRS7XHJdl9.99

(Excerpt) Read more at liveleak.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: angara; launch; rocket; russia
I don't really believe Putin would have this thing launch into a geosync orbit with a dummy payload, oh no no no...
1 posted on 12/23/2014 9:45:32 AM PST by Patriot777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Patriot777

Unicorn farts CAN indeed be used as rocket fuel! I KNEW IT!


2 posted on 12/23/2014 9:49:10 AM PST by Klemper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777
The first stage of the Angara-5 rocket, capable of delivering up to 25 tons to a low orbit, is powered by RD-191, arguably the world’s best “clean” engine that uses kerosene and oxygen as fuel.

"Clean" or more efficient? A liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen (LH2/LOX) is more "clean" than kerosene and oxygen, as the byproduct of LH2/LOX is water vapor.

3 posted on 12/23/2014 10:00:33 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

More efficient, methinks.


4 posted on 12/23/2014 10:14:41 AM PST by Patriot777 (Imagine....that we could see Obama being hauled out of the White House kicking and screaming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777

Gastrointestinary orbit.


5 posted on 12/23/2014 10:15:33 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777; Klemper

That is what I thought as well. The headline does make it sound like they are using “unicorn farts” or other “clean” sources for fuel instead of conventional fuels.


6 posted on 12/23/2014 10:26:21 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

“Using a mass accumulation of Vladimir Putin’s brain farts, we were able to fuel the rocket and launch it into a gastrointestinal orbit. But, unfortunately, SpaceX launched a rocket fueled with Cajun red beans into a similar orbit, its payload being probiotics, and caused the Vladrocket to rapidly decay orbit and burn up upon reentry. Some of the rocket parts did not completely disintegrate, however, and landed upon one of several of Putin’s castles. No one has heard from the man since.”


7 posted on 12/23/2014 1:24:03 PM PST by Patriot777 (Imagine....that we could see Obama being hauled out of the White House kicking and screaming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
Geptyl used in previous rockets is poisonous.
8 posted on 12/23/2014 4:23:10 PM PST by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777
USA signed $$1bln contract with Russia on buying RD191 jet motors for space programs.
9 posted on 12/23/2014 4:27:13 PM PST by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cossak

I’ve not heard of geptyl, and can’t find a link. Do you have one?

Kerosene (RP-1) has been in use by the US for quite a while. Saturn V first stage used RP-1.


10 posted on 12/23/2014 5:08:46 PM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cossak

I guess the Obomination administration drank Russia’s Kool-Aid and believe RD191 motors are more earth-friendly.
Russian rubbish.


11 posted on 12/24/2014 6:22:39 AM PST by Patriot777 (Imagine....that we could see Obama being hauled out of the White House kicking and screaming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
It is asymmetric dimetylhydrazine AFAIK. More effective than kerosene but toxic.
12 posted on 12/25/2014 3:48:59 PM PST by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777

They did not manage to produce expensive crap so use cheap Russia’s one.


13 posted on 12/25/2014 4:07:50 PM PST by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cossak

Ah, hydrazine, that I know. Typically, the US uses that for upper stage, or for satellite boosters.


14 posted on 12/25/2014 6:15:15 PM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777; Cossak

That contract may be in trouble due to geopolitical issues (plus US rocket companies making hay of the situation...).


15 posted on 12/25/2014 6:16:47 PM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
I think hydrazyne and dimetylhydrazine are different things. Geptyl is used in USSR/Russia made cruise missiles Kh55, Kh555, first stages of heavy ICBM Satan, heavy rocket Proton.
16 posted on 12/26/2014 6:45:00 PM PST by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
All contracts have risks due to geopolitical issues. But contracts stabilize somehow political situation, anyway it is better to have contracts than not.
17 posted on 12/26/2014 6:50:35 PM PST by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cossak

I thought they just used vodka in their rockets.


18 posted on 12/26/2014 7:20:29 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cossak

While technically different, UDMH and hydrazine are somewhat interchangeable terms.


19 posted on 12/29/2014 7:32:16 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson