Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Why the Army? Shouldn’t this be the USAF?


33 posted on 12/17/2014 9:11:49 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Those who profess noblesse oblige regress to droit du seigneur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

The Army has traditionally had the tasking of coastal defense of the country and in the modern era they operated the anti-aircraft missiles along with artillery.

Trivia bit-———The B17 got the moniker of Flying Fortress in the 1930s when the Army Air Corps was trying to pry funding out of Congress. They sold the program as a defensive extension of the Coast Artillery and not as an offensive weapon for foreign war. Attack an enemy fleet when it was further out to sea.

The name had nothing to do with the plane’s machine guns since the early Forts hardly had any.


35 posted on 12/17/2014 9:22:56 PM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson