Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The word “injunction” is not found at the link, nor is there discussion of a judicial “order.” It’s one thing to issue a finding; it is quite another to issue an order pursuant to the finding. I await a legal order that precludes the issuance of Social Security numbers to illegal aliens. An opinion is not enough, although this ruling may justify injunctive relief.


10 posted on 12/17/2014 1:13:25 AM PST by Carry_Okie (Those who profess noblesse oblige regress to droit du seigneur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

11 posted on 12/17/2014 1:31:57 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

This is not the injunctive lawsuit that Arpaio has filed nor the 24 State (Abbott) Injunctive lawsuit (https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/files/epress/files/20141203ImmigrationExecutiveOrderLawsuit.pdf).

Arpaio filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction in the DC Circuit Court (http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/141204-FINAL%20Motion%20for%20Preliminary%20Injunction.pdf) and has won Fast Track status and will be heard December 22, 2014 (Next Monday from today’s date;http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/dc-federal-court-orders-expedited-preliminary-injunction-hea).

This judge was hearing a case of an illegal and hearing arguments as to why he could not be deported. But his ruling reinforces the Amnesty lawsuits of Arpaio and Abbott.


13 posted on 12/17/2014 3:51:46 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson