” The public’s “right to know” has often been invoked to justify publicizing confidential information. But is there any evidence that the American public was clamoring to learn state secrets, which every government has? I don’t know where our nuclear weapons are located and I don’t want to know, certainly not at the cost of letting our enemies know.”
Of course, the “right to know” is not what the left wants. They want to demoralize, and thus destabilize, our police and military. The end result is to hurt recruitment of good people as well. Pure evil. That is all this is about.
Sowell can simplify a complex issue like no one else can.
Hear, hear, Dr. Sowell. We don’t need — and our enemies especially don’t need — to hear how we gather intelligence. If Obama wants to share state secrets with the public, maybe start with his kindergarten transcripts and documents, working slowly up through high school and his college applications and transcripts.
What’s that you say, Mr. President? Those documents would be more shocking to Americans than anal feeding?? Because they would learn that they what? Voted in a guy who wasn’t actually American as their President? Born in a Canadian unwed mothers’ home, to a teen girl too young to confer citizenship? So went to Oxy college paid for by Indonesia as an Indonesian student? Something screwy about the way he got into Harvard? Never had an American passport until he was voted into the Senate, when they conferred one on him even with no birth certificate? Nancy Pelosi knew the whole time and signed off on his state candidate forms to cover for him? Hmmmm. Yeah, back to discussing torture, then.
Liberals argue that, “we have to be better than the enemy”.
The enemy then argues that, “we have to help liberals get elected”.
An sane person would say of course. Except the hypocritical libs - they would only say of course if they and their families were at risk.
Sneaking around with full intent to murder and maim as many as possible, including women, children and the elderly, is an attack on civil society. Given their revolting, immoral intent, the ONLY moral thing to do with them FOR ALL INVOLVED is make sure copycats in waiting know for a fact that if caught, they await a fate that is brutal, excruciating, prolonged, humiliating, and ultimately deadly. They have forfeited all right and standing to demand humane treatment.
Their treatment should acknowledge their potential future victims and be known to be so inhumane and so unimaginably severe as to be a true deterrent. You don’t respect life and humanity if you are unwilling mete out just punishment for truly cruel, depraved and antisocial crimes. For the nature and intent of their crimes, nothing should be out of bounds and should strike petrifying fear among their ranks.
Feinstein quite the hypocrite: has steered arms deals to her husband's business, violtated law to arm herself, was part of the bipartisan passage of the post-9/11 legislation----while Hussein the Twelfth Imam practices the Alinsky principle, destroy your enemy with his own morality--
The damage Carter's DCI Turner did to humint has never been repaired
Atta's crew was in Conus the year prior
Weldon's attempts to walk back the cat with Able Danger resulted in his ouster and their censure
From Gorelick's Wall we have Feinstein's mining and sapping--
Platoon: "Gooks in the wire--it's a lovely war."
