Posted on 12/12/2014 5:51:40 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
It isn't clear that Obama hates the country he himself described as the source of his citizenship: "By the 1948 British Nationality Act I was born a subject of the British Commonwealth." British Common Law observes jus sanguineous citizenship principles, and has since at least the fifteenth century. A child inherits the citizenship of his father, regardless of where the child is born. This insures the inheritance of property, responsibility for military service, and tax liabilities to sustain the monarch. The child of a British subject, regardless of where he is born, is a natural born subject. Only a natural born subject may serve in the parliament. The U.S. has a similar naturalization law, born to a citizen, but adds attachment through a jus soli requirement; U.S. citizens must also be born on sovereign U.S. soil.
It seems more likely that Barry, who never claimed to be a natural born citizen of the U.S., is simply an effective spokesman for progressives of both political parties, both of whose political operatives see advantage in further depreciating what used to be our foundation upon a Constitution. Both party's operatives are beholden to financial interests whose patronage increases each of their personal wealth and guarantees them a lavish pension through both real and sham lobbying positions. Barry is an effective salesman for government domination, replacement of private industry with quasi-public institutions, much like John Boehner and Harry Reid. He is not a constitutional president, but he honestly told us that he regards the Constitutiona as a flawed historical document.
You, it would seem.
I don’t believe it either. Probably some Black Caucus folks.
As if a country should live under the yoke of colonialism.
Those weren’t Tea Partiers but the NY Media will report them as Tea Partiers.
R U calling me a bigot? You don’t want to do that.
I probably do, with you:
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Excellent Point.
I’ll explain it from my perspective. Yes, we may think these things privately or speak of them among ourselves online, but most Tea Party folks are smart enough not to act that way in public, because such actions and words from us would be used to devalue our more substantial concerns.
Our more substantial concerns being to reduce the encroachment of government into our private and professional lives. Most conservatives place a lot of value in proper decorum while in public. Thats’ why you see us picking up trash after our demonstrations. That’s why you don’t hear us using profanity nearly as fluently as most libs. We try to articulate our point of view by using reason while in public. In private, yes, many of us do believe these concepts about Obama and far worse than what’s listed here.
We usually know how to compartmentalize better than Libs, who eat, sleep breathe and do all but fuel their cars on the strength of emotion.
Right Wing Watch: fair and balanced.
Exactly.
Slyfox, I’d guard your back.
Did you just threaten me?
That they called him ‘the Kenyan’ also sounds like infiltrators, to me. They’ve been reading FR or something, picked up some lingo so as to blend in. (They want to be US so bad!!!)
Something about this is not passing the smell test.
A search on the heading brings up all kinds of lefty sites “reporting” this.
Ha ha ha.
Tea party people wouldn’t be that stupid as to suggest such.
Now a NAZI , a Klan member, or Occupiers might spout off like that.
Any thing coming from right wing watch should be viewed with much suspicion.
Tea parties don’t call for murder/hanging. So. No
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.