Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elhombrelibre
Pats point was that it was a treaty that England had to defend Poland that forced it into war and that the treaty was ill conceived.

Just like a NATO (American) commitment with the Ukraine and other Russian border states is also ill conceived.

27 posted on 12/09/2014 10:59:34 AM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: duckln

Pat would also say that the partitioning of E. Europe between the Nazis and Soviets was “none of our business.” Leading to the question, when does the gobbling-up of small countries become our business?


28 posted on 12/09/2014 11:14:58 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: duckln

And his point was that Poland should have been tractable instead of intractable and principled. His point too was that Churchill was part of the problem. If Pat were a Liberal instead of a pseudo conservative, you’d probably see through him, I’d say.


29 posted on 12/09/2014 11:19:37 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson