Is The Obama Regime Implementing His Civilian Army Via Holder’s Civil-Rights-Fabricated-Crisis?

The Gateway Pundit ^ | 12/7/14 | Jim Hoft

[Nachum]

An excellent article at National Review touches on a premise that many aren’t talking about enough. The main point of the article is that the war on police is about control (similar to the control of healthcare via Obamacare). This point needs to be expanded upon, so everyone understands that Obama’s vision of a civilian-army may be at the heart of the means-justify-the-ends violence induced by fabricated war-cries of “racism” and “civil-rights” violations.

Think about what Obama asked for in a recent speech? Obama called for cameras on every police officer. On the surface, this sounds like a great idea. Understandably, many would actually agree with the idea of cameras on police officers because it could help protect them from false claims of abuse. But ask yourself another CRUCIAL question: “Why is it up to the FEDERAL GOVT. to mandate this nationally via Federal taxpayer money?”

Possible answer: If OBAMA has complete control of the camera program—wouldn’t he also have complete control of what video footage to release or withhold? This should not be a Federal Government program. To preserve individual rights in this country, the camera issue (or any police policy issue for that matter) NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED LOCALLY at the community level. Now imagine Congress pushing through another 3,000 page bill that no one has read—nationalizing the police force across the country—and we have to pass it to find out what’s in it. The LIV (Low Information Voters) all agree it’s a great idea as it is sold to us as putting cameras on every police officer.

Just keep this flashback Obama campaign promise in mind:

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[2ndDivisionVet]

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts

[null and void]

At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Hussein Obama, 7/2/2008

They don’t call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps that we deserve) defense. The official name is National Civilian Community Corps.

I think of it as the NatCCC, or more simply, as the NatCs...

[null and void]

[gaijin]

of interest

[MeshugeMikey]

with friends...like al sharpton.....obies capable of ANYTHING!!

[longtermmemmory]

TSA part II

[TigerClaws]

Sure wish someone would take out ads on black radio stations pointing out Obama’s amnesty plan is going to place millions of Hispanics in jobs blacks once held creating record unemployment in the black community.

[SunkenCiv]

Obama called for cameras on every police officer. On the surface, this sounds like a great idea. Understandably, many would actually agree with the idea of cameras on police officers because it could help protect them from false claims of abuse. But ask yourself... If OBAMA has complete control of the camera program -- wouldn't he also have complete control of what video footage to release or withhold? This should not be a Federal Government program.

[TLI]

Obama’s vision of a civilian-army may be at the heart of the means-justify-the-ends violence induced by fabricated war-cries of “racism” and “civil-rights” violations.

If the practitioners of the recent violence in the name of accounting for wrongful actions by LEO's is little bammy's idea of a civilian army, it will not get very far in an actual maneuver to contact action.

Such an "army" would be mowed like green grass.

.

[upchuck]

Police body cameras equal another step towards 1984 becoming a reality.

Yes, this should be a local issue. Perhaps a state issue. Most definitely NOT a Federal issue.

[glock rocks]

Stay the corpse, we much!

[SaraJohnson]

Congress better watch it. But he has already nationalized the police through “terrorism” training and drills via Homeland insecurity. That is why we are having the problems we are having.

[Tomato lover]

Bumping for future reference.

Praying this will be stopped.

[Travis McGee]

Once every cop has a federally mandated camera, they’ll be networked into federal fusion centers.

“Who is the closest officer to the incident? Officer Smith 739 Bravo: turn left, draw your weapon,”

Etc.

What else is at the end of this road but total federal control of every LEO?

[Travis McGee]

Once every cop has a federally mandated camera, they’ll be networked into federal fusion centers.

“Who is the closest officer to the incident? Officer Smith 739 Bravo: turn left, draw your weapon,”

Etc.

What else is at the end of this road but total federal control of every LEO?

[Faith65]

bkmk

[Vehmgericht]

Tonton Macoute

[DuncanWaring]

Good analogy.