Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bogey78O
I think my original prediction of 58-42 may still be met.

Nate Silver was also 58-42.

16 posted on 12/06/2014 6:50:32 PM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: MUDDOG

While I was hoping for a 60-40 trouncing, I guess I can be happy with 58-42. :=)


21 posted on 12/06/2014 7:00:55 PM PST by Bob (Violence in islam? That's not a bug; it's a feature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: MUDDOG

58? When? (The over under for Nate Silver for the Senate was 51 seats in 2014. That being the case, then 54 seats after this election was over performing, much to my surprise.)


83 posted on 12/07/2014 7:47:32 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson