Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyop

Agreed! Good point...the wicked are always a step ahead of us when it comes to lexicon...;-(


17 posted on 12/05/2014 2:36:25 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Jan_Sobieski

That N.O.W. leader should not have pushed me out of a university English program. ;-)


19 posted on 12/05/2014 2:38:49 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“Sexual connection with a woman without her consent” (1913 Webster).

That was a definition from 1913.

“Forcible sodomy” in at least some states until recently, was used to describe the separate crime of assault with anal penetration.

That way, for example, if a woman is attacked and violated, the criminal can be charged with both rape and sodomy, if both occurred.

And men aren’t made to seem more like women (part of the homosexual and feminist agenda). Sodomy, being a more dangerous kind of assault (more likely HIV and other problems), should get harsher sentences anyway.

Sodomy should not be tolerated, even in prisons.


20 posted on 12/05/2014 2:47:15 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson