Posted on 12/03/2014 9:33:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind
If there is one uniting feature of the national protests surrounding the shooting death of Ferguson teen Michael Brown, it is the notion that he had his “hands up” just before his killing.
Today, columns of protesters march in major American cities with their hands raised chanting “Hands up, don’t shoot.” The organization Hands Up United, an activist group which advocates for criminal justice reform and the firing and prosecution of a variety of Missouri-based law enforcement figures, was founded on this idea. Several of members of the news media have latched onto it, and some even suggest that it serves to call into question the conduct of Officer Darren Wilson.
Not everyone in the press is, however, as infatuated with this idea. In the wake of the Ferguson grand jury’s determination that no criminal charges could be filed against Wilson, one of the claims that was called into question by the evidence presented was the suggestion that Brown had his hands raised in surrender when he was shot and killed.
“It’s a lie,” exclaimed MSNBC host Joe Scarborough after observing that even some members of the U.S. House of Representatives had adopted this gesture in the halls of Congress in solidarity with the slain teen. “They know it’s a lie. They know the cops didn’t shoot him with his hands in the air. They know it’s a lie, and they’re doing this on the Capitol floor?”
This assertion from Scarborough seems to have frustrated some of his fellows in the press. “To those who say #HandsUpDontShoot perpetuates a lie, 16 witnesses say #MichaelBrown had his hands up at some point,” tweeted CNN anchor Chris Cuomo on Wednesday. “Only 2 say he didn’t.”
The origins of this oversimplification of the evidence presented to the grand jury might have been a popular chart published by PBS’s News Hour (a higher resolution version of which can be found here):
Judging from this chart alone, the majority of witnesses whose testimony was presented to the Grand Jury testified that Brown did have his hands raised at the time of his killing. This, many also suggest, was a gesture of submission – one which went ignored when he was callously gunned down by former Officer Wilson.
There is no sugarcoating it: This is a misreading of the evidence.
“[T]he witness accounts contained in thousands of pages of grand jury documents reviewed by The Associated Press show many variations about whether Brown’s hands were actually raised – and if so, how high,” an AP report on the actual witness testimony read.
Some witnesses said the 18-year-old Brown had his hands held high toward the sky on Aug. 9 as officer Darren Wilson gunned him down. Others thought they saw his hands partially raised, at about shoulder height. To some witnesses, his palms appeared out, as if surrendering. To others, his palms seemed open, as if glancing at his wounded hand or gesturing with an attitude of “what are you going to do about it.” Some said Brown’s hands were not raised at all.
The truth may never be certain. Despite a three-month grand jury investigation and an ongoing federal probe, no one has publicly disclosed any photos or videos capturing exactly what transpired.
To summarize, some of the witnesses who said Brown’s hands were raised were not credible (one claimed that Brown was shot in the back – an assertion not corroborated by the results of several autopsies). Others say his hands were raised only partially, some of which may have been an involuntary reflex prompted by having been shot. Still other witnesses claimed that Brown raised his hands in a gesture of aggression.
This context changes matters rather significantly, and it is nothing short of a lie to suggest that all these witnesses agree that Brown was capitulating at the time of his death (though I do not believe this was Cuomo’s contention).
The Washington Post’s Paul Cassell noted the problems associated with PBS’s chart, some of which that news outlet even conceded.
PBS acknowledged that its chart “doesn’t reveal who was right or wrong about what happened that day, but it is a clear indication that perceptions and memories can vary dramatically.” This concession is required, because a fair assessment (such as the grand jury was tasked with making) involves not simply toting up the number of witnesses on competing sides, but determining the quality of their accounts. The grand jury observed the demeanor of all of the witnesses and, perhaps even more important, had other evidence (including physical evidence) to sort out which witnesses were giving credible testimony.
An incredibly thorough visual representation of the myriad ways in which this PBS chart misleads its readers can be found here. That extensive graphic explains why merely suggesting that the majority of witnesses claim Brown had his hands raised deceives the reader. The six of those 14 witnesses, some of whom were the most credible, only suggest that his hands were half raised.
The most important notion which cannot be explained in charts, and which all journalists have a responsibility to relate to their audiences, is the truism that witness testimony is notoriously unreliable. Those who grasp onto testimony that does not comport with the more sound physical evidence to which the grand jury was privy are clinging a faith-based conviction that Brown was the aggrieved party in this incident.
None of this matters, of course, to those who seek to perpetuate the myth that Brown was surrendering when he was somehow fatally shot in the top of his cranium. The truth is of no matter when emotionality and “larger truths” about social justice are being exposed. But myths only have half-lives while factual evidence has staying power. Eventually, the myth will fade as will the public’s interest in this incident. The members of the press who went out of their way to commit sins of omission in the service of a sexy and inflammatory narrative are only doing damage to their own credibility, not to mention national comity.
EXCELLENT POST.
Myth or no myth that “hands up, don’t shoot” pose is the new icon for the left. Somebody can make a good amount of money creating a sculpture of the pose, mass produce copies of all sizes. Great Christmas gift for the deranged liberal in any family.
Truth doesn’t matter—only emotional feel good lies. hence Obama elected twice. Such as it is.
This lie MUST continue to be perpetuated until the race hustlers and grifters have emptied their warehouses of the “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” T-shirts, hoodies, coffee mugs, posters, jackets, bongs, etc. they’ve had manufactured over the past few months. It’s all about the Benjys.
It’s not a myth; it’s a LIE!
This makes them a magnitude more dangerous.
“Pants up, Don’t loot” should do well, too. Except in many areas it would draw physical attacks.
We do know that his hands went for the cops gun, probable cause to shoot him.
The myth is the AGENDA, aided and abetted by the media who keep harping on it.
How else can Obama establish a National Police System, other than to discredit the current community law enforcement.
What ever happened to "States Rights" to hold accountability locally rather than the undue influence and interference from centralized/statist FED ?
The Constitution was designed to limit the Fed , not to limit the people, or their representative government.
It’s not a myth.
It’s a bullsh!t lie.
Life will turn out better for them.
Now they know what they have to do!
Fake but accurate once again appears in the liberal theology.
I thought it was, “Pants Up Don’t Loot!”
As I said on an earlier post, when legend becomes fact, print the legend. People like Sharpton jumped on the Michael Brown bandwagon way too early. As evidence came out about Brown himself and the circumstances they still clung to him, despite the fact that since Brown’s death there have been at least half a dozen or so far more questionable police shootings. But Sharptons of the world have too much invested in a thug and stick with him while ignoring the others.
The Ferguson protesters say they are protesting racial discrimination by the police. Their example is a thug who attacked a police officer and managed to get himself shot. That is not discrimination.
People being beheaded by ISIS is discrimination. Christians being forced to choose between their religion and execution, that is discrimination. Young girls being kidnapped and forced into sham “marriages” because they choose to get and education, that is discrimination. Christian bus riders in Somalia being executed while Muslim riders on the same bus are freed, that is discrimination. Protest those cases of real discrimination, if you just have to protest something.
On the other hand, in a visit to a suburban Houston shopping mall recently, I witnessed something quite different. There were black people, Hispanics, Indians, Pakistanis, orientals, Anglos, and people whose ethnicity was not obvious, all being civil and respectful of each other. There were lots of “thank you’s” and well wishes from the customers, along with sincere “may I help you’s,” and “did you find what you were looking for” from the clerks. Everyone said “mam” and “sir.” I am proud to say that it was an improvement from the Houston in which I grew up in the 1960’s. We should celebrate that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
