[gogeo]

but they don’t. we are not living in some fantasy libertarian vacuum where the negative personal acts of someone only affect that person and nobody else.

I've witnessed a few pot referendums, including the last successful one.

I've wondered why proponents...

1) Claim there's no negative side effects to smoking weed.

2) Pledge to dedicate X% of the revenues to addiction treatment.

[Secret Agent Man]

the bottom line is they are selfish people.

i want to take drugs and i’m going to reject your arguments that my drug taking is going to negatively impact the’lives of others around me, onemwayor another.

they have to ignore human history. and they do b/c they are selfish and just want to do what they want to do, and damn ceveryone else. if i kill someone on pot, just lock me up then. that,s how frickin concerned they are.

[samtheman]

I've witnessed a few pot referendums, including the last successful one.

I've wondered why proponents...

1) Claim there's no negative side effects to smoking weed.

2) Pledge to dedicate X% of the revenues to addiction treatment.

Kind of like the Globull Warmists who say:

1. Here's why there's no actual warming yet and what is masking it...

2. Here are all the horrible effects of warming that we are witnessing right now...