Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ALASKA

Well, I don’t necessarily agree with your other statements but that exact thought about why Oswald didn’t shoot the Prez. head-on I thought of immediately as well. Newsweek dropped the ball on that for sure.


78 posted on 11/22/2014 8:53:59 PM PST by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: BeadCounter

“Well, I don’t necessarily agree with your other statements......”

And you don’t have to, but if you watch the film and read the testimony, it’s all there.........


80 posted on 11/22/2014 9:11:58 PM PST by ALASKA (Disgusted.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: BeadCounter; ALASKA
Shooting at a downward angle causes raises the impact point above the sights mark.

An approaching target with increasing down angle aggravates the problem

A target moving away (and in the case of JFK, moving uphill) with reducuing angle minimises it.

99 posted on 11/22/2014 9:43:54 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Television: Teacher, Mother, Secret Lover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson