I don’t believe in charging anyone with something that allegedly happened when Christ was a corporal. If and when some recent allegations come to light I’ll take them serious.
These are old allegations, already investigated, no indictment, end of story. Move along, nothing to see here.
Clinton on the other hand raped a woman as the sitting president. He is now a God of the democrat party.
You have more proof that Cosby drugged and raped Constand in 2004, than you do that Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick 20 years before that, in 1984.
Constand went to the police, the DA believes her story, ten other women came forward to tell of his similar rapes and Cosby settled out of court with her. Much more evidence than we accept in the Clinton rape claim.
Here is just about the only that Cosby has said about this, it sounds very Clintonesque.
“”Through the years, Cosby has only given one interview on Constand’s accusations – to The National Enquirer, which ran in March 2005.
“Looking back on it, I realize that words and actions can be misinterpreted by another person,” Cosby told the tabloid, “and unless you’re a supreme being, you can’t predict what another individual will do.
“I’m not saying that what I did was wrong, but I apologize to my loving wife, who has stood by my side for all these years, for any pain I have caused her,” he told the Enquirer. “These allegations have caused my family great emotional stress.”””