Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/20/2014 5:25:57 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Bump!


2 posted on 11/20/2014 5:37:57 AM PST by 4Liberty (Prejudice and generalizations. That's how Collectivists roll......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This has been suggested as a partial solution to the high cost of health care for a long time. More competition. The democrat controlled congress shot down every republican proposal for healthcare reform and I believe this was one of them.


3 posted on 11/20/2014 5:48:41 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You could also solve this problem by not allowing governments to dictate what is covered in plans.

I.e.-

What we had before: states dictate different sets of coverage.

CommieCare solution: Fed dictates coverage so state doesn’t matter.

Free Market solution: don’t dictate coverage.


7 posted on 11/20/2014 6:45:25 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hey, a real, actual use of the Commerce Power!


8 posted on 11/20/2014 7:15:04 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Great article.

But let’s remember, you couldn’t buy health insurance from outside your State before Obamacare. The State legislators and insurance boards created and maintained health insurance monopolies then and that practice continues under Obamacare.

It is even worse under Obamacare. In many cases your choice of insurance companies is limited by the COUNTY you live in. You don’t even have access to other insurance sold in your own State on the ‘exchanges’

Obamacare was about creating new monopolies and strengthening old ones all throughout our healthcare system.

The whole thing stinks from top to bottom but let’s not pretend that some of these features were not there before. The worst of them have been retained and strengthened under Obamacare.

We need REAL reform.


9 posted on 11/20/2014 7:17:22 AM PST by Lorianne (fed pork, bailouts, gone taxmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
In Massachusetts, for instance, health insurance policies must cover at least 49 specifiedtreatments and types of providers, among them midwives, infertility treatments, hair prostheses, and chiropractors. But what if all you want is a plain-vanilla health plan akin to those sold by insurers in New Hampshire (only 38 state-required health-care mandates) or, better yet, in Michigan (24) or Idaho (13)?

It would be interesting to see just what the cost of a health care policy with similar deductables would cost in each of these states and find out just what the savings are.

10 posted on 11/20/2014 7:27:52 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“In Massachusetts, for instance, health insurance policies must cover ... infertility treatments...”

In CA, they cover infertility treatments for gay couples.


12 posted on 11/20/2014 1:13:03 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson