Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kid Shelleen

The answer is in the yesterday’s NY Times article:

“He said he had no assets, save for a watch and a ring. Everything else, including some of his suits, was owned by a for-profit business, Revals Communications, he said.”


10 posted on 11/19/2014 5:59:48 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proxy_user
"“He said he had no assets, save for a watch and a ring. Everything else, including some of his suits, was owned by a for-profit business, Revals Communications, he said.”"

No assets? Doesn't he get paid handsomely by his TV show?

Plus with NAN, he's GOT to be making a lot of $.

How long would any other "charity" be around if the CEO was taking 95% of the "donations" and buying suits for him?

Why the IRS wasn't all over this guy's a$$ 20 years ago is a mystery.

It's still a mystery why he hasn't been behind bars for the last decade.

Generally FBI snitches don't get to go out and start grifting again.

11 posted on 11/19/2014 6:28:04 PM PST by boop (I was unaware that beating up people is wrong. Until the NFL seminar told me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson