Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LucyT
"It looks bad in the context of this article. In the context of what seems to have actually happened, it looks fine.

Although that’s the implication of the article, Wilson doesn’t lock the guy up for taking pictures. -- The guy was arrested for refusing to take a summons Wilson was trying to serve (the latest of many, as Wilson notes in his report)."



Yep already figured so. Just more nonsense hyping from another BS Internet article.

146 posted on 11/16/2014 2:09:49 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
I understand that's what Officer Wilson's report says. I understand that may well have been the underlying reason for the arrest.

However, Officer Wilson doesn't say that in the video. Officer Wilson tells the videographer that he (Officer Wilson) is going to arrest the videographer if he continues to take his (Office Wilson's) photograph.

After Officer Wilson approaches the videographer, we never hear what Officer Wilson says before the arrest, during the arrest, and after the arrest. We also never hear what Officer Wilson says before the start of the video.

147 posted on 11/16/2014 2:25:19 PM PST by Scoutmaster (Opinions don't affect facts. But facts should affect opinions, and do, if you're rational)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson