I didn’t evade the question; I hadn’t read it yet.
And, no, since that was not my assumption when I read it, I’d have to say it is not true that “anyone” reading the report would assume the resident had the camera right in Wilson’s face. The fact that you read it that way proves that you read it that way, not that everyone does.
Is it not true anyone reading Wilsons report would assume the resident had his camera right in Wilsons face?
I noted you evaded the question. Is this not true?
I didnt evade the question; I hadnt read it yet. And, no, since that was not my assumption when I read it
Then that makes you an extremely disingenuous individual.