I agree, in spades (heh, heh).
It's even worse than that--she wasn't even criticizing, she was analyzing and stating her opinion on a technical aspect of a proposed law--i.e., its cost. She was discussing potential policy, not editorializing on the President--which might come closer to the notion of disrespect, but should be fair game anyway.
“She was discussing potential policy, not editorializing on the President—which might come closer to the notion of disrespect, but should be fair game anyway.”
Preferred minorities may not be questioned.
This media interference for Obama reminds me of “Planet of the Apes”, where only apes can use the word “no”. Any humans is beaten for saying “no” to an ape. Today only liberals are allowed to discuss Obama’s agenda; anyone else is racist for even discussing it...