Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton seeks third-party opponent
NY Post ^
| Nov. 14, 2014
| Richard Johnson
Posted on 11/15/2014 6:33:51 AM PST by COUNTrecount
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: COUNTrecount
Sure worked for her hubby.
2
posted on
11/15/2014 6:34:59 AM PST
by
Luke21
To: COUNTrecount
Hey, Robert Sarvis will be happy to help her out.
3
posted on
11/15/2014 6:36:42 AM PST
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: COUNTrecount
No need to find space aliens.
Notice all the three ,or more,party races in the last election.
4
posted on
11/15/2014 6:38:41 AM PST
by
DUMBGRUNT
(The best is the enemy of the good.)
To: COUNTrecount
I thought Slick Willie’s wife had 2016 in the bag. Why does she think this is necessary?
5
posted on
11/15/2014 6:39:50 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
('Provisional ballots'. When legal votes just aren't getting the job done. - The DemocRATS.)
To: COUNTrecount
McCain will run Independent if HillBill will pickup the tab.
6
posted on
11/15/2014 6:40:26 AM PST
by
moovova
To: COUNTrecount
Smart move (Hillary is not stupid... Just evil). We need to make the GOP candidate the conservative candidate so as to make a 3rd party candidate unnecessary.
7
posted on
11/15/2014 6:40:51 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: COUNTrecount
Huckster is dumb enough to fall for this.
8
posted on
11/15/2014 6:41:26 AM PST
by
Zathras
To: COUNTrecount
That third party scheme will appeal to the many Kamikaze Conservatives on this forum. They view all Republicans with disdain because few can pass all 17 purity tests.
Just a bunch of RINO's in their view and it's better to throw the election to a Liberal this time to once again teach the Republicans some sort of lesson. Better to be right than win elections!
And the beat goes on ..............
9
posted on
11/15/2014 6:41:37 AM PST
by
Buffalo Head
(Illigitimi non carborundum)
To: COUNTrecount
Clinton campaign strategists have concluded Hillary will easily be nominated in 2016, Don't tell the very rich and very public Hollywood donors. They give big heap'um praise and wampum to squaw.
10
posted on
11/15/2014 6:43:22 AM PST
by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: COUNTrecount
Is Perot still alive.
Are the Perot voters still bragging about their one big moment in history, delivering our country to the Clintoons?
The only thing lower than the Clintoons are the Perot Voters.
11
posted on
11/15/2014 6:44:13 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(The Democrats, who run America are too old, too rich, and too very/very white elitist losers!.)
To: Luke21
“Sure worked for her hubby.”
She would have a lot of followers on FR who pretend to love America.
12
posted on
11/15/2014 6:46:22 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(The Democrats, who run America are too old, too rich, and too very/very white elitist losers!.)
To: Buffalo Head
Better to be right than win elections!
13
posted on
11/15/2014 6:48:03 AM PST
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: COUNTrecount
Can we please do the same and run someone to pick up those who won’t vote Conservative and/or Republican, but who also despise hillary?
To: Luke21
Sure worked for her hubby.It's been a plan since Wilson's time. Find a GOPer with a huge ego. Have your supporters work back-channel cutouts to whisper sweet nothings in his ear about how he should really be the GOP's candidate; that he should run anyway if they reject him. Make sure he's got enough money. Launch and enjoy your plurality victory.
To: COUNTrecount
Silly Hillary! Just get the GOPe to shove another DemLite candidate down our throats in 2016 like they did last time! That’ll guaran-damn-tee a third party candidate!
16
posted on
11/15/2014 6:50:30 AM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: TBP
Better to be right than win elections! The flip side is, of course, why the hell does it matter if you win elections if you're wrong?
To: Buffalo Head
It’s how we got Claire McCackle.
Jim Talent wasn’t “pure” enough for SW Missouri.
To: COBOL2Java
Your 2nd sentence will come true, but I doubt the 3rd will. If it does, Hillary will love it.
19
posted on
11/15/2014 6:56:07 AM PST
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: COUNTrecount
She will get one if Jeb, Christie, or Mitt are on the ballot.
20
posted on
11/15/2014 6:58:28 AM PST
by
indthkr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson