Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

Right now the Russians are pretty much without a Navy, let’s hope they lose these 2 new ships.


2 posted on 11/15/2014 1:19:00 AM PST by ansel12 (The churlish behavior of Obama over the next two years is going to be spellbinding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

To be honest I don’t understand why does Russia need extensive Navy at all.
I think a purchase of these ships makes no sense and it was probably a stupid political act to prop up bankrupt French shipbuilders and do France a favor for some unknown future benefits.
I actually believe Khrushchev ‘s naval doctrine of a boomer as a main naval force was the most fitting for Russia.
Gorshkov’s doctrine of the 1970s which was about to field a dozen aircraft carriers and outnumber USN in a number of ships was a waste and useless.
Russia is a peaceful nation which is not fomenting takeovers on the other sides of the globe after all.


3 posted on 11/15/2014 1:49:27 AM PST by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

meanwhile we are retiring the U.S.S. Peleliu

http://www.peleliu.navy.mil/


4 posted on 11/15/2014 1:59:13 AM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson