Posted on 11/14/2014 12:50:54 PM PST by Jim Robinson
In July, former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin wrote a widely-publicized op-ed for Breitbart News. Enough is enough of the years of abuse from this president, she wrote. Without borders, there is no nation. Obama knows this. Opening our borders to a flood of illegal immigrants is deliberate. This is his fundamental transformation of America. Then, she dropped the bomb: Its time to impeach; and on behalf of American workers and legal immigrants of all backgrounds, we should vehemently oppose any politician on the left or right who would hesitate in voting for articles of impeachment.
Believe it or not, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) had actually suggested impeachment even earlier, this time over the Bowe Bergdahl prisoner swap, in which the Obama administration freed five top-level Taliban terrorists in exchange for the alleged deserter. He stated, There will be people on our side calling for his impeachment if he did that. And Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) said in March that Obama could be up for impeachment if he continued his unconstitutional approaches to immigration reform and Obamacare.
But it was Palins comments that drove ire. At the time, Palins critics leapt on the comments to suggest that Republicans more broadly were planning impeachment; House Speaker John Boehner immediately fired back, stating that he disagreed with Palin on impeachment.
There were some who defended Palins position Mark Levin explained, our country is being destroyed
.Heres the dead truth. Obama should be impeached, but he wont be impeached. Obama should be impeached if the Republicans take the Senate, but he wont be impeached if the Republicans take the Senate. Obama has committed high crimes and misdemeanors by violating the constitution.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Ping to my post #279 above.
Popeye's Wimpy Conservative: "We'll gladly pressure the RINO on Tuesday if you vote for him today."
Yes, you manifest true, dictionary defined self righteousness.
Your righteousness is as filthy rags before God even if you show Him hey, you voted for Ronald Reagan.
We have to approach God on the mercies plan.
You are what self deception looks like. You think you can make a deal with devil and not lose.
One other thing, Redneck. How long have you been voting straight Republican ticket? How many years? Please?
Ha ha ha ha ha!
Your “righteousness” consists in patting yourself on your back as you stand aloof, or as you commit your own compromise only at a different level.
Bud, you could vote for NOBODY and claim righteousness before the Lord, on your model, and it is clearer than crystal.
Thank you, Exit! You’re still on the ball I see!
You voted for a pro abortion, pro homosexual politician to LEAD AMERICA. You voted for that abomination knowingly because you LACKED THE FAITH IN GOD that He would stand by you in the long run if you stood by your faith rather than your fear of Obama.
Yeeeesh.
Again, how long have you been voting straight Republican ticket?
There was zero compromise with Romney. All the “compromise” was purely your own wishful thinking.
Yes, I see that group of deep compromisers that is now the ascendant GOP... I can play that game too, Finny. I am not impressed.
Can you document that this was the case, and that it is not your wishful thinking that demonizes him.
Surely with Mitt there would not have been an abortion pushing Obamacare.
In function and action, you voted FOR Romney one hundred percent. I understand why you did and I understand all of your rationalizations because I rationalized the same way for decades. I have woken up; you are still slumbering.
WAKE UP.
Your irrelevant accusation proves nothing.
I vote the viable candidate that makes the better channel for God’s blessings, as best as I can ascertain.
Talk about wishful thinking. *sigh*
Did you do any due diligence on Romney at all?
What I am telling you is that I ASCERTAINED EXACTLY THE WAY YOU DID FOR DECADES. So did my mom, for almost twice as many decades.
We finally figured out that THAT APPROACH IS THE WRONG ONE.
You have yet to figure it out.
You presume and argue that I embraced every single solitary thing that Mitt was about... or idolized him (maybe that’s how YOU view politicians, but I never idolize them) which you know is a strawman and you know demolishes your own accusations.
You are arguing from evil anger.
Incidentally, to correct some more of your strawmen, I would have been far more tickled to have a Sarah Palin on the ticket. (Put in Herman Cain, etc.) But that didn’t happen. So this is the person who won the race, because of the “Christian conservative” circular firing squad killing the rest... yes even Sarah Palin whom many condemned because she did not have Bristol on puppet strings.
I looked and estimated that it would be a more likely possibility to push blessing through Mitt than through Barack. Again to correct your strawman I never embraced all of what Mitt was about.
Talk about making bluffing assertions.. I call your bluff and ask you to substantiate your hypothetical prognosis.
Sorry — I meant see my post #278. YOU are the Wimpy Conservative who wears his Christianity on his sleeve.
Thanks, basil!
Good to hear from you.
We are bookends to the Class of ‘98.
I think the traitor should be arrested, tried and if found guilty of treason hung.
That is why I say impeachment is getting off light. Impeachment for lil things. This muslim has created a system to destroy America, bit by bit
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.