Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zhang Fei

Kay, I thought about your answer and I realize my question was a little silly:

I think you believe that the rules will revert to the old arrangement, simply because it is in the GOP interest to make the approval “bar” higher, rather than the unusual place to which it was lowered.

Right?


11 posted on 11/13/2014 5:07:15 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: gaijin
I think you believe that the rules will revert to the old arrangement, simply because it is in the GOP interest to make the approval “bar” higher, rather than the unusual place to which it was lowered. Right?

Theoretically, when your party has the White House, you want the bar lowered. The GOP obviously doesn't have the White House. In practice, the super-majority required for a confirmation vote may have saved us from Harriet Miers.

14 posted on 11/13/2014 5:11:58 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin
I think you believe that the rules will revert to the old arrangement, simply because it is in the GOP interest to make the approval “bar” higher, rather than the unusual place to which it was lowered. Right?

Some of this is so that purple state Republicans don't have to look blatantly ideological by voting against the President's nominees. Just flip the party labels, and it works the same way when when the Dems have a Senate majority and the GOP the White House.

17 posted on 11/13/2014 5:17:22 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson