‘IMHO this is going to go right to the attention of the USSC for the king v burell writ...’
I think so too. The smart thing would be for people like Ronan Farrow to just leave it alone. Hope it stays only on ‘right wing’ outlets & dies down. But to give it air time on liberal outlets only keeps the narrative alive. As they say in public relations, you can’t put out a fire with gasoline. The more the MSM tries to soft soap it, the worse it gets for them. No way the SC can simply ignore it. Not after all this.
Unfortunately the USSC shares the sentiment toward the mind of the american voter with Gruber.
To drag out the word “nuanced” in the context of walking back an earlier inoperative comment is a further insult to the American voting public. I mean, shades of Kerry. Can the MSM come up with this stuff and keep a straight face? Ronan Farrow deserves an oscar, not a pulitzer. maybe they should have a new journalism award, but Godwin’s Law interferes with the name I would give it...
Anyway the MSM, when not censoring itself, is parodying itself, trying to come up for excuses for this guy. Sheesh.
Meanwhile, until the MSM starts being honest, “nuanced” seems to be the newspeak for declaring inconvenient truths in public and then needing to void the statements as inoperative later.