[Lakeshark]

Good grief, if you haven't been paying attention since 2008, that's not my fault. She's been scolding the GOP AND the bamster about this issue virtually every month for well over four years, clearly in the non amnesty camp. If you've been on FR, then you've either seen it and not noted, decided to ignore it for your own intellectual dishonesty, or as I suspect, you've purposely blocked out the truth.

Do your own search, it'll knock your socks off, you'll see just how wrong you are. I have no desire to do the work of someone who isn't interested in the truth.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Do your own search, it’ll knock your socks off, you’ll see just how wrong you are. I have no desire to do the work of someone who isn’t interested in the truth.

_______________________________________

Here is what I posted above:

Sarah Palin on immigration:

http://www.ontheissues.org/sarah_palin.htm

Supports a path to citizenship, but no amnesty for illegals. (Oct 2008)

And your response is that I have not been paying attention since 2008.

Well, here is one of her latest responses circa July 2013 [with my comments in brackets]:

http://www.latintimes.com/immigration-reform-2013-sarah-palin-reverses-2008-stance-path-citizenship-undocumented-immigrants

EXCERPT:

Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?” asked Ramos.

“No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty,” said Palin. “You know, people have got to follow the rules. They’ve got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.”

[And how is this different from what she said in 2008 as I posted it? SHE’s AGAINST AMNESTY BUT SHE QUALIFIES IT WITH “NOT TOTAL AMNESTY”, which seems to imply that there is some path to citizenship she is open to ]

“To clarify,” said Ramos, “so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?”

“I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.”

[SO, SHE IS AGAINST AMNESTY BUT SUPPORTS A PATH TO CITIZENSHIP. SHE SAID SO JUST A YEAR AGO. HOW IS THAT DIFFERENT FROM WHAT I POSTED ON WHAT SHE SAID IN 2008? NOTHING DIFFERENT. YOU’RE MAKING MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. ]

As of this writing, all I can conclude are the following:

1) She’a against amnesty

2) But she supports a path to citizenship.

No different from what she said in 2008.

Unless of course, she changes her mind again...