GOP Must Embrace Americans and American jobs
Article brought to you courtesy of Mr. Slim.
Been searching but can’t find where the author was born. I’m being he’s not a natural born citizen.
What are they talking about? The Republican GOTV failed spectacularly in 2012. Then there is union money and money from the liberal superrich.
The "gray lady" must be gray because of the haze of all the marijuana smoke in the building.
Wow....these NYT’S bone heads just don’t get it...
The Hispanic vote went for the GOP in the largest numbers seen ever....Because they stood against illegal immigrant...
legal Hispanics don’t want illegals taking their jobs and pushing down wages...
“Latinos represent the fastest growing demographic in the electorate”
They are breeding like cockroaches and the people who
say they can’t afford to have children are the ones paying
the taxes that pay for those kids birth, health care and
education. And for what? So they can grow up and worship
people like Che Guevara.
Deport the wetbacks and prosecute the employers.
What a surprise! The NYT says since the GOP won, we must embrace socialism. If the Dems had won, they would take that as a sign we should embrace socialism. Since it is getting warmer, cooler, cloudier, less stormier, you name it, we should embrace socialism.
The NYT refuses to believe that the Democrats have a WHITE voter problem, particularly among White men. There are still a lot more White voters than minority voters, and that was why they lost big.
In spite of engineering congressional districts so that Blacks an Latinos can be elected, the vast number of districts are majority White. When the old 60s Leftists die off, this country will be more conservative than it is now. Young Whites who can’t afford to go to college to be brainwashed but have to work hard for their money will be conservatives.
Amnesty is about replacing the current electorate that has too many native born Americans and too many white Americans with a new one of Democrat voting legalized immigrants who are mostly Hispanic and “Asian”
Who voted in for Obama in 2012 by 70%
Of course such a change happens year by year, not all at once.
SUMMARY-—
The current electorate is “too white” for the Democrats
Whatever, but ‘enthusiasm’ was not the problem the Dems had with Hispanics here in Texas, their problem was getting them to vote Democrat.
Our most conservative statewide candidate, by a mile, Dan Patrick, wanted a Secure Border, opposed in-state college tuition for Illegals, supports Voter ID, opposes Amnesty, and is opposed to the Sanctuary Cities (i.e., places where the police won’t report felon-illegals to Immigration) and God knows what else. In short, Dan Patrick was a Republican consultant’s WORST NIGHTMARE in a state that now has nearly as many Hispanics as it does whites (most of those Republican consultants are gay, by the way).
On top of that, he was running against a well-respected Latina State Senator. So the Democrats got handed an EASY VICTORY in the race for Lt. Governor, arguably the most powerful position in Texas politics - the whites would give Dan a small majority, but Hispanics and blacks would give vote massively against him, and our first Latina Lt. Governor would take office in January - with a chastened Republican Party not knowing what hit them.
Oh, almost forgot to mention...Patrick won 46% of the Hispanic vote (better than any other statewide candidate). He won 75% of the white vote. Blacks, of course, came out against him, but there simply are not enough to change results here. Patrick won his race by 19 points. Hispanics had their chance to send a message on Immigration, and they did for sure in that race.
This brainstem's thesis is dead from its opening sentence.
Ted Cruz for President following the 2008 and 2012 elections, obamacare and soon-to-be amnesty for all shows a skilled hand pulling strings few can feel while they dance to the music being played.
Looking forward from the early 1980s, I would not have believed this would be our fundamentally transformed reality. Truly amazing.
Would someone please do the research, and see if we cannot find ONE issue the New Communism Times was EVER right on?