Very high virus loads on skin and in sweat, virus receptors on Langerhans cells in skin, very very low ID50, and inadequate PPI or inadvertent contamination while removing heavily contaminated PPE.
You're quite correct that the high HCW infection rate is an important, and neglected, clue, but I don't think it supports airborne transmission - in fact, it's a good argument against it.
Jim.... LOL
I noticed you failed again to respond to many of my questions.
Do you really think you are winning friends and influencing people???
The more you cherry pick yours answers the more I’m convinced that’s it’s airborne.
You see the Health Care workers in West Africa in a full Hazmat suits, and they are still getting it Jim!!!
Then you make the ludicrous statement,
“You’re quite correct that the high HCW infection rate is an important, and neglected, clue, but I don’t think it supports airborne transmission - in fact, it’s a good argument against it.”
How is it a good argument against it being Airborne if it can spread so easily, though the Hazmat suits??? I am just trying to understand your logic.
You do know 2 + 2 = 4??? It does not equal 5 or 10 as Common Core would advocates would say it is. Follow the linner path Jim. Follow the logic. LOL!
I am beginning to believe you are a Fugazi Jim. In case you ask what is a Fugazi? Here you go.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ixd-N8_Drc